Peer review Process

• Submission Screening – All papers are checked for format compliance.
• Plagiarism Check – Submissions are screened using standard tools (Turnitin/iThenticate); papers exceeding the similarity threshold are rejected.
• Double-Blind Review – Eligible papers are reviewed by at least two independent experts.
• Evaluation Criteria – Assessment based on originality, technical soundness, relevance, clarity, and contribution.
• Review Outcomes – Accept, Minor Revision, Major Revision, or Reject.
• Final Decision – Technical Program Committee (TPC) makes the acceptance decision.
• Publication – Accepted & registered papers (camera-ready version) are published in the proceedings and submitted for indexing.